Abstract
This chapter proposes a conceptual framework for comparing enterprise and governmental approaches to corporate social responsibility (CSR) for developed and developing countries. An enterprise approach is voluntary. A governmental approach provides either requirements or guidance, strong or weak, for enterprise CSR. Focus is on multinational enterprises (MNEs), for two reasons. First, MNEs may operate across quite different conditions. Second, a major MNE concern has to do with fair trade and sustainable development supply chains. The chapter considers three approaches found in the extant literature. One approach asserts autonomy of developing countries from developed countries, and thus divergence of enterprise and governmental CSR by type of context. A second approach examines global convergence as highly context path-dependent and perhaps cosmetic. A third approach emphasizes “glocality” combining global thinking with local action. The author proposes an alternative understanding of how to compare CSR for developed and developing countries using theory versus context.
Reference112 articles.
1. Income inequality and the tax structure: Evidence from developed and developing countries.;A.Adam;Journal of Comparative Economics,2015
2. Corporate Social Responsibility in Challenging and Non-enabling Institutional Contexts: Do Institutional Voids matter?
3. Amaeshi, K., Adi, B., Ogbechie, C., & Amao, O. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Nigeria: western mimicry or indigenous influences? International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility (ICCSR), Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham, UK. Retrieved from http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/business/ICCSR/assets/researchpapers/39-2006.pdf
4. Reconstructing the corporate social responsibility construct in Utlish
5. The Social Context of Corporate Social Responsibility
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献