Disruptive Democratisers?

Author:

Hood Nina1,Littlejohn Allison2

Affiliation:

1. The University of Auckland, New Zealand

2. The Open University, UK

Abstract

Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are described as disruptive and democratising. It is claimed MOOCs have characteristics that challenge traditional forms of education. This chapter critiques these claims, arguing that MOOCs do not always allow for the diverse motivations of masses of learners. This brings into question forms of data-based support based on and in response to learner behaviours. The chapter interrogates narrative accounts of MOOC learner experiences to pinpoint four distinct ways people learn in MOOCs. Factors critical to learning are motivation, self-regulation, environment and socialisation. Developing analytic tools that address these are important. However, analytics systems tend to personalise learner support in relation to pre-defined course goals, rather than focusing on the goals of the learner. Next generation systems are already focusing on empowering learners to follow their own goals and flexing course designs to fit the goals of each learner. These are more powerful than systems where the students have to adapt to a course designed for the masses.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference59 articles.

1. Proposal for a conceptual framework for educators to describe and design MOOCs.;C.Alario-Hoyos;Journal of Universal Computer Science,2014

2. Amo, D. (2013, November). MOOCs: Experimental approaches for quality in pedagogical and design fundamentals. Paper presented at TEEM ’13, Salamanca, Spain.

3. Toward a Typology of MOOC Activity Patterns

4. Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment.;L.Barnark-Brak;International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,2010

5. Interest and Self-Sustained Learning as Catalysts of Development: A Learning Ecology Perspective

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A qualitative study to understand the perspectives of MOOC providers on accessibility;Australasian Journal of Educational Technology;2021-09-20

2. AI in education: learner choice and fundamental rights;Learning, Media and Technology;2020-07-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3