THE ALGORITHM OF COMPETITIVE NORMALIZATION OF CRITERIA IN RATING SYSTEM OF EVALUATION OF THE INTELECTUAL ACHIEVEMENTS

Author:

Horborukov V. V.1ORCID,Prykhodniuk V. V.1ORCID,Franchuk O. V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. NC “Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine

Abstract

In the study and analysis of most processes occurring in any field of human activity, there are applied problems that actually belong to the theory of decision making. The most common of these tasks is to build a ranking list of certain objects (subjects), from which you need to choose the best (worst) in terms of the total value of certain attributes that characterize these objects. The complexity of such tasks is that, as a rule, there are no cases when one or more objects have significant advantages over others in all indicators taken into account. That is why there is a need to apply existing methods of decision theory, as well as to develop algorithms that allow mathematical consideration of the specifics of specific practical problems. The article considers the problem of assessing the achievements of secondary schools in intellectual competitions conducted by the Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and the Ministry of Education and Science, and describes the developed algorithm of competitive normalization of criteria for rating participants. This problem was formalized with the help of ontological methodology, which allowed to implement the algorithm for its solution in the mathematical software TNIAS (Transdisciplinary Network-Centric Information-Analytical System). The developed algorithm is based on the competitive nature of the process of establishing the degree of dominance of some alternatives over others, depending on the analysis of numerical characteristics, which were observed over a period of time. In the general case, the use of the algorithm is most successful in problems when the calculation of rating indicators of alternatives depends not on the absolute numerical values of some criteria, but on the number of alternatives that have close values and do not reach or exceed certain thresholds established by analysis subject area.

Publisher

Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Reference17 articles.

1. Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. New York : Wiley.

2. Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-criteria decision analysis: methods and software. Chichester : John Wiley & Sons.

3. Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Boston : Springer Science and Business Media, Inc.

4. Larichev, O. I. (2003). Teoriya i metody prinyatiya resheniy [Theory and methods of decision making]. Moscow : Logos [in Russian].

5. Chernorutskiy, I. G. (2005). Metody prinyatiya resheniy [Decision-making methods]. SPb : BKhV-Peterburg [in Russian].

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. ОНТОЛОГІЧНА МОДЕЛЬ ОЦІНЮВАННЯ ІНТЕЛЕКТУАЛЬНИХ ДОСЯГНЕНЬ УЧНІВ;Herald of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine;2022-12-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3