Affiliation:
1. Department of Speech & Hearing, Sciences JG-15, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
2. Idaho State University, Pocatello
Abstract
For many of us, not having data concerning a client’s progress during treatment is tantamount to being unprepared for a lecture, or showing up at a birthday party without a present—totally unthinkable. This zealous position is based on the assumption that clinical decisions regarding treatment efficacy should be based on data. Data, in this case, refers to both quantitative and qualitative information that provides evidence for deciding the course of treatment. This is not to say that data can and should be collected on every aspect of the clinical process. Indeed, intuitive decision-making on the part of the speech-language pathologist is often warranted. But in general, a series of decisions regarding whether or not treatment is working, can and should be based on data. This article examines the ways in which we can measure treatment progress, and provides guidelines for the reader in the use of a data-based, decision-making model.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Otorhinolaryngology
Reference18 articles.
1. The Notion of Clinically Significant Change
2. Treatment efficacy: How long to treat: A multiple outcome approach;Campbell T.;Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,1991
3. Accountability in action: Entry, measurement, exit;Eger D.;Seminars in Speech and Language,1988
4. Holloway A. & Bain B. (November 1992). Treatment efficacy: Determining when to withdraw treatment. Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association San Antonio Texas.
Cited by
42 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献