Author:
Bothe Anne K.,Franic Duska M.,Ingham Roger J.,Davidow Jason H.
Abstract
Purpose
To address questions raised by T. Meline and W. E. Harn (2008) in their critique of our previous article (A. K. Bothe, J. H. Davidow, R. E. Bramlett, D. M. Franic, & R. J. Ingham, 2006).
Method
Additional information is provided to address several issues raised by Meline and Harn.
Results and Conclusions
Our previous systematic review omitted 1 relevant article about the use of olanzapine in stuttering, but the minimal effectiveness and the known serious side effects of this drug limit the implications of this omission. While we do not agree with many of Meline and Harn’s critiques of our review, we do agree with them that several larger points raise interesting questions about the structure, analysis, and usefulness of literature reviews in stuttering and in other areas. Fundamentally, we reassert our agreement with Meline and Harn that there is insufficient evidence to support the use of existing pharmacological agents in the treatment of stuttering.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Otorhinolaryngology
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献