Affiliation:
1. The University of Georgia, Athens
2. University of California, Santa Barbara
Abstract
Purpose
To complete a systematic review, with trial quality assessment, of published research about behavioral, cognitive, and related treatments for developmental stuttering. Goals included the identification of treatment recommendations and research needs based on the available high-quality evidence about stuttering treatment for preschoolers, school-age children, adolescents, and adults.
Method
Multiple readers reviewed 162 articles published between 1970 and 2005, using a written data extraction instrument developed as a synthesis of existing standards and recommendations. Articles were then assessed using 5 methodological criteria and 4 outcomes criteria, also developed from previously published recommendations.
Results
Analyses found 39 articles that met at least 4 of the 5 methodological criteria and were considered to have met a trial quality inclusion criterion for the purposes of this review. Analysis of those articles identified a range of stuttering treatments that met speech-related and/or social, emotional, or cognitive outcomes criteria.
Conclusions
Review of studies that met the trial quality inclusion criterion established for this review suggested that response-contingent principles are the predominant feature of the most powerful treatment procedures for young children who stutter. The most powerful treatments for adults, with respect to both speech outcomes and social, emotional, or cognitive outcomes, appear to combine variants of prolonged speech, self-management, response contingencies, and other infrastructural variables. Other specific clinical recommendations for each age group are provided, as are suggestions for future research.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Otorhinolaryngology
Reference132 articles.
1. The demands and capacities model I: Theoretical elaborations
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). Treatment efficacy summary: Stuttering. Retrieved March 27 2006 from www.asha.org/NR/rdonlyres/4BAF3969-9ADC-4C01-B5ED-1334CC20DD3D/0/TreatmentEfficacySummary.pdf
3. Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Stuttering Treatment
4. Stuttering: Considerations in the evaluation of treatment;Andrews G.;The British Journal of Disorders of Communication,1971
5. An Approach to the Evaluation of Stuttering Therapy
Cited by
156 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献