Self-Reported Stuttering Severity Is Accurate: Informing Methods for Large-Scale Data Collection in Stuttering

Author:

Horton Sarah12ORCID,Jackson Victoria34,Boyce Jessica12ORCID,Franken Marie-Christine5ORCID,Siemers Stephanie1,John Miya St12,Hearps Stephen1,van Reyk Olivia1,Braden Ruth12,Parker Richard6,Vogel Adam P.278ORCID,Eising Else9,Amor David J.11011ORCID,Irvine Janelle12,Fisher Simon E.913,Martin Nicholas G.6,Reilly Sheena114,Bahlo Melanie34,Scheffer Ingrid101516,Morgan Angela1211ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

2. Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

3. Population Health and Immunity Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

4. Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

5. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Speech and Hearing Centre, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

6. QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

7. Centre for Neuroscience of Speech, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

8. Redenlab Inc. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

9. Language and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

10. Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

11. Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

12. Stuttering Treatment and Research Trust (START), Auckland, New Zealand

13. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

14. Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Australia

15. Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine at Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

16. Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Abstract

Purpose: To our knowledge, there are no data examining the agreement between self-reported and clinician-rated stuttering severity. In the era of big data, self-reported ratings have great potential utility for large-scale data collection, where cost and time preclude in-depth assessment by a clinician. Equally, there is increasing emphasis on the need to recognize an individual's experience of their own condition. Here, we examined the agreement between self-reported stuttering severity compared to clinician ratings during a speech assessment. As a secondary objective, we determined whether self-reported stuttering severity correlated with an individual's subjective impact of stuttering. Method: Speech-language pathologists conducted face-to-face speech assessments with 195 participants (137 males) aged 5–84 years, recruited from a cohort of people with self-reported stuttering. Stuttering severity was rated on a 10-point scale by the participant and by two speech-language pathologists. Participants also completed the Overall Assessment of the Subjective Experience of Stuttering (OASES). Clinician and participant ratings were compared. The association between stuttering severity and the OASES scores was examined. Results: There was a strong positive correlation between speech-language pathologist and participant-reported ratings of stuttering severity. Participant-reported stuttering severity correlated weakly with the four OASES domains and with the OASES overall impact score. Conclusions: Participants were able to accurately rate their stuttering severity during a speech assessment using a simple one-item question. This finding indicates that self-report stuttering severity is a suitable method for large-scale data collection. Findings also support the collection of self-report subjective experience data using questionnaires, such as the OASES, which add vital information about the participants' experience of stuttering that is not captured by overt speech severity ratings alone.

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Subject

Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference42 articles.

1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Fluency disorders [Practice portal]. Retrieved January 4 2023 from http://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/fluency-disorders/

2. Andrews G. & Harris M. (1964). The syndrome of stuttering. Heinemann.

3. Social anxiety disorder in adults who stutter

4. Australian normative data for the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering

5. Self‐reported impact of developmental stuttering across the lifespan

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3