Affiliation:
1. Royal Dutch Auris Group, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
2. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
3. Research Center for Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands
Abstract
Purpose:
Children with a developmental language disorder (DLD) are often delayed in their grammatical development. This is suggested to be the most important characteristic and clinical marker of DLD. However, it is unknown if this assumption is valid for young children, in the earliest stages of grammatical development. For this reason, this study investigates the complexity, diversity, and accuracy of the grammatical repertoires of 3- to 6-year-old Dutch children with DLD, in comparison to that of typically developing (TD) children matched on grammatical level.
Method:
Language samples of 59 children (29 children with DLD and 30 TD children) were analyzed using multiple measures of grammatical complexity, diversity, and accuracy. The TD children and children with DLD were language-matched on their grammatical development using the levels of the Dutch version of the Language Assessment, Remediation, and Screening Procedure, the Taal Analyse Remediëring en Screening Procedure (TARSP; Schlichting, 2017). Thus, the children with DLD were significantly older than the TD children (respectively DLD age range: 2;7–5;4 [years;months],
M
age
= 4;1; and TD age range: 2;0–3;9,
M
age
= 2;9).
Results:
The results show that children with DLD are comparable to language-matched TD children in their grammatical accuracy and diversity, but that they produce less complex utterances.
Conclusions:
The results indicate that children with DLD lag behind in their grammatical complexity as compared to language-matched TD children. The results also suggest that grammatical TARSP level is not sufficiently informative for selecting treatment goals. Instead, the results underline the importance of conducting language sample analyses, with special reference to the complexity of the utterances of a child with DLD.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference34 articles.
1. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4
2. Boerma T. Selten I. &
Everaert E.
(2020). Het taalprofiel van kinderen met het 22q11.2 deletiesyndroom in vergelijking met kinderen met TOS [Conference poster presentation]
. TaalStaal 2020 Nieuwegein the Netherlands. https://www.taalstaal.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/VCF-Syndroom-Everaert-e.a.pdf
3. Bol, G. W. (1995). Implicational scaling in child language acquisition: The order of production of Dutch verb constructions. In M. Verrips & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Papers from the Dutch-German colloquium on language acquisition, Amsterdam series in child language development, 3. Institute for General Linguistics.
4. The production of pronouns in Dutch children with developmental language disorders: A comparison between children with SLI, hearing impairment, and Down's syndrome
5. Grammatical analysis of developmental language disorders: A study of the morphosyntax of children with specific language disorders, with hearing impairment and with Down's syndrome
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献