Affiliation:
1. Department of Communication Disorders, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to investigate how different types of background noise that differ in their level of linguistic content affect speech acoustics, speech fluency, and language production for young adult speakers when performing a monologue discourse task.
Method
Forty young adults monologued by responding to open-ended questions in a silent baseline and five background noise conditions (debate, movie dialogue, contemporary music, classical music, and pink noise). Measures related to speech acoustics (intensity and frequency), speech fluency (speech rate, pausing, and disfluencies), and language production (lexical, morphosyntactic, and macrolinguistic structure) were analyzed and compared across conditions. Participants also reported on which conditions they perceived as more distracting.
Results
All noise conditions resulted in some change to spoken language compared with the silent baseline. Effects on speech acoustics were consistent with expected changes due to the Lombard effect (e.g., increased intensity and fundamental frequency). Effects on speech fluency showed decreased pausing and increased disfluencies. Several background noise conditions also seemed to interfere with language production.
Conclusions
Findings suggest that young adults present with both compensatory and interference effects when speaking in noise. Several adjustments may facilitate intelligibility when noise is present and help both speaker and listener maintain attention on the production. Other adjustments provide evidence that background noise eliciting linguistic interference has the potential to degrade spoken language even for healthy young adults, because of increased cognitive demands.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference52 articles.
1. Acoustic Changes in the Production of Lexical Stress during Lombard Speech
2. Aubanel, V. , Cooke, M. , Villegas, J. , & Lecumberri, M. L. G. (2011). Conversing in the presence of a competing conversation: Effects on speech production. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH, August, pp. 2833–2836.
3. Bidirectional Interference Between Speech and Nonspeech Tasks in Younger, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults
4. A Qualitative Study of Interference With Communicative Participation Across Communication Disorders in Adults
5. Boersma P. &
Weenink D.
(2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.4) [Computer software]
.
http://www.praat.org/
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献