Telling Stories in Noise: The Impact of Background Noises on Spoken Language for People With Aphasia

Author:

Nelson Brenna Scadden1,Harmon Tyson G.1ORCID,Dromey Christopher1ORCID,Clawson Kirsten Dixon1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Communication Disorders, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine how different background noise conditions affect the spoken language of participants with aphasia during a story retell task. Method: Participants included 11 adults with mild to moderate aphasia and 11 age- and gender-matched controls. Participants retold stories in a silent baseline and five background noise conditions (conversation, monologue, phone call, cocktail, and pink noise). Dependent measures of speech acoustics (fundamental frequency and mean intensity), speech fluency (speech rate and disfluent words), and language production (correct information units [CIUs], lexical errors, lexical diversity, and cohesive utterances) were compared between groups and across conditions. Results: Background noise resulted in higher fundamental frequency ( f o ) and increased mean intensity for control participants across all noise conditions but only across some conditions for participants with aphasia. In relation to language production, background noise interfered significantly more with communication efficiency (i.e., percent CIUs) for participants with aphasia than the control group. For participants with aphasia, the phone call condition led to decreased lexical diversity. Across groups, condition effects generally suggested more interference on speech acoustics in conditions where continuous noise was present and more interference on language in conditions that presented continuous informational noise. Conclusions: Although additional research is needed, preliminary findings suggest that background noise interferes with narrative discourse more for people with aphasia (PWA) than neurologically healthy adults. PWA may benefit from therapy that directly addresses communicating in noise. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.23681703

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Subject

Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Otorhinolaryngology

Reference46 articles.

1. Audacity Team. (2020). Audacity(R): Free audio editor and recorder (Version 2.4.1) [Computer application]. https://audacityteam.org/

2. A Qualitative Study of Interference With Communicative Participation Across Communication Disorders in Adults

3. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2021). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org/

4. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers

5. Cahana-Amitay, D., & Albert, M. L. (2015). Redefining recovery from aphasia. Oxford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3