Affiliation:
1. School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
2. CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, Hamilton, Canada
3. Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Abstract
Purpose:
Parent-implemented early communication interventions are commonly delivered to culturally and linguistically diverse families. Although there is evidence from fields such as public health or psychology, there is little guidance regarding what elements to culturally adapt for parent-implemented speech-language pathology interventions. This scoping review addresses this gap by identifying parent-implemented early communication interventions that have been culturally adapted and describing which intervention components were adapted. Definitions of culture, use of adaptation frameworks, and adaptation guidelines, policies, and recommendations are also reported.
Method:
The databases Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase via OVID were searched. Supplementary search methods, including hand-searching of references and a gray literature search, were also conducted. Covidence software was used to deduplicate, collate, and review articles. Population, intervention, study, and cultural adaptation data were extracted and synthesized using the Ecological Validity Framework.
Results:
Twenty-one articles were included from the database and supplementary searches. No studies defined culture, and only three used cultural adaptation models or frameworks to guide adaptation. Studies varied greatly in what they adapted; language adaptations, such as translation, were conducted most frequently, and intervention goals were rarely adapted. Only three studies obtained parent feedback to inform cultural adaptation for future recommendations.
Conclusions:
More clarity in the reporting of cultural adaptation for communication interventions is required. Cultural adaptation frameworks are useful tools to guide adaptation but can be difficult to operationalize. Additional research in this area is necessary to help clinicians provide culturally responsive, parent-implemented communication interventions.
Supplemental Material:
https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.20416107
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Otorhinolaryngology
Reference75 articles.
1. Systematic review: cultural adaptation and feasibility of screening for autism in non-English speaking countries
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Cultural competence [Practice Portal]. https://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Professional-Issues/Cultural-Competence/
3. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2017). Issues in ethics: Cultural and linguistic competence.
http://www.asha.org/Practice/ethics/Cultural-and-Linguistic-Competence/
4. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2015). Almost 8 percent of U.S. children have a communication or swallowing disorder. The ASHA Leader 20(8).
https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.NIB1.20082015.10
5. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2021). Profile of ASHA members and affiliates year-end 2020 .
https://www.asha.org/siteassets/surveys/2020-member-and-affiliate-profile.pdf
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献