Affiliation:
1. University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
Abstract
The aviation community has invested great amounts of money and effort into crew resource management (CRM) training. Using D. L. Kirkpatrick's (1976) framework for evaluating training, we reviewed 58 published accounts of CRM training to determine its effectiveness within aviation. Results indicated that CRM training generally produced positive reactions, enhanced learning, and promoted desired behavioral changes. However, we cannot ascertain whether CRM has an effect on an organization's bottom line (i.e., safety). We discuss the state of the literature with regard to evaluation of CRM training programs and, as a result, call for the need to conduct systematic, multilevel evaluation efforts that will show the true effectiveness of CRM training. As many evaluations do not collect data across levels (as suggested by D. L. Kirkpatrick, 1976, and by G. M. Alliger, S. I. Tannenbaum, W. Bennett, Jr., & H. Traver, 1997), the impact of CRM cannot be truly determined; thus more and better evaluations are needed and should be demanded.
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference105 articles.
1. Attitude Changes in Navy/Marine Flight Instructors Following an Aircrew Coordination Training Course
2. KIRKPATRICK'S LEVELS OF TRAINING CRITERIA: THIRTY YEARS LATER
3. A META-ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONS AMONG TRAINING CRITERIA
4. Arnold, R. L. & Jackson, D. L. (1985). Recurrent cockpit resource management training at United Airlines. In R. S. Jensen, & J. Adrion (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 345–351). Columbus: Ohio State University.
Cited by
265 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献