Ethnoregional Separatism in Europe: Disintegration vs. Integration?

Author:

Oskolkov P. V.1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Europe (Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Having been in the 2000s far from the spotlight of the news, European separatism is gradually returning to the information fi eld, which is partly due to the alerting reports from Scotland and Catalonia. The paper attempts to answer the following questions: what is the nature of the ethnoregional separatism in the EU, how does disintegrational agenda cohabit with the European integration dynamics, and what are the prospects for European separatism. The review of the theoretical framework within which ethnic and regionalist separatism exists is followed by the analysis of the empirics gained from diff erent European regions claiming independence or autonomy, such as Scotland, Catalonia, Flanders, Brittany, and many others, in 2000–2021. The author attempts to demythologize the widespread misconception about separatism as a potentially deadly threat to the EU nation-states or the European unity. The research is situated within the constructivist view towards ethnicity and the symbolic practices employed by the separatists; this paradigm is complemented by the institutional approach to the EU governing bodies and practices. The author comes to the following conclusions: currently, disintegrative projects within the EU nation-states cannot be successful, because of the position of the EU and the member states, and due to the uncertainties in the ethnic regions themselves (however, Scotland makes for an important exception, because of Brexit). Most separatist cases in the EU are either of instrumental or of a pure autonomist nature and do not enjoy any support from the integrational grouping that is not ready for the troubles the “internal extension” might cause. Moreover, if in the late 20th century, a discernible trend for decentralization and devolution was present, now the pendulum took the reversed direction, or at least remains unmoving; the author observes the trend for recentralization or at least for the freezing of the current fragile balance.

Publisher

Moscow State Institute of International Relations

Reference25 articles.

1. Busygina, Irina, and Anton Onishchenko. “The Polish Minority in the Republic of Lithuania: Internal and External Factors.” Baltic Region 11, no. 1 (2019): 43–59 [In Russian].

2. Eremina, Natalya. Politiko-pravovyje mekhanizmy devolutsii v keltskikh regionakh Velikobritanii. SaintPetersburg: Saint-Petersburg University Press, 2011 [In Russian].

3. Connor, Walker. “Temptation of Economic Explanations.” In Etnos i politika, 116–118. Moscow: URAO Press, 2000 [In Russian].

4. Krivorotov, Andrey. “Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay.” Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law 14, no. 1 (2021): 118–134 [In Russian].

5. Narochnitskaya, Ekaterina. “Separatism: Varieties, Typology and European Realities.” Current Problems of Europe, no. 6 (2015): 32–55 [In Russian].

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3