Species Richness, Stem Density, and Canopy in Food Forests: Contributions to Ecosystem Services in an Urban Environment
Author:
Rockwell Cara A.ORCID, Crow Alex, Guimarães Érika R., Recinos Eduardo, La Belle Deborah
Abstract
Food forests expand the traditional concepts of urban forestry and agriculture, providing a broad diversity of tree-related ecosystem services and goods. Even though food forest systems bridge an obvious gap between agriculture and forestry, their potential value in the urban landscape is often undervalued. The inclusion of edible species in urban forest stands can enhance nutrition and well-being in the urban landscape, where food deserts are common. The potential for ecosystem services is especially pronounced in subtropical and tropical regions, where there is a heightened need for shade due to climate change-related heat waves. For this study, we investigated the tree species richness, stem density, and canopy cover provided by food forest gardens in 10 Miami-Dade County, Florida public schools located in the urban landscape. We compared results with neighboring properties around the schools and discovered that the food forest canopy was comparable with neighborhood urban tree cover. Additionally, we established that arborescent species richness (including an increase in edible taxa) and stem density was higher in food forests than in adjacent neighborhood plots. We posit that local food production could be enhanced by planting edible species in small spaces (e.g., empty lots or residential yards), as opposed to focusing on just ornamental taxa or recommended street trees. Our study highlights the importance of using mixed edible tree species plantings (especially with consideration to provisioning, regulating, and supporting services), potentially meeting urban forestry and agricultural goals proposed by urban planners and managers.
Reference92 articles.
1. Ahern, J. (2013). Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: The promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 1203–1212. 2. Albrecht, S., & Wiek, A. (2021). Food forests: Their services and sustainability. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 10(3), 91–105. 3. Andersson, E., Langemeyer, J., Borgström, S., McPhearson, T., Haase, D., Kronenberg, J., Barton, D. N., Davis, M., Naumann, S., Röschel, L., & Baró, F. (2019). Enabling green and blue infrastructure to improve contributions to human well-being and equity in urban systems. BioScience, 69(7), 566–574. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz058 4. Barona, C. O., Devisscher, T., Dobbs, C., Aguilar, L. O., Baptista, M. D., Navarro, N. M., da Silva Filho, D. F., & Escobedo, F. J. (2020). Trends in urban forestry research in Latin America & the Caribbean: A systematic literature review and synthesis. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 47, Article 126544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126544 5. Barron, S., Sheppard, S. R., & Condon, P. M. (2016). Urban forest indicators for planning and designing future forests. Forests, 7(9), Article 208.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|