Local Participation or Elite Capture in Sheep’s Clothing? A Conundrum of Locally Led Development

Author:

Craney AidanORCID

Abstract

This article discusses concepts of legitimacy and elite capture in locally led development through a case study of the Pacific-based Green Growth Leaders’ Coalition (GGLC). GGLC is a fellowship of persons identified for their developmental leadership potential on issues of sustainability and economic growth. Members are recruited into an exclusive grouping dedicated to influencing positive developmental change through informal networks and political backchannels. With their membership representing people who both self-identify and are locally recognised as leaders, queries exist to the extent to which their efforts represent a shift towards greater ownership of developmental processes at local levels or simply reinforce elite capture of ‘local voice’ in the most aid-dependent region in the world. Rather than necessarily offering straightforward answers to questions of legitimacy and elite capture, the example of GGLC demonstrates how complex the notion of locally led development can be in practice.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference60 articles.

1. Abe, A. (2009). Social capital formation and local capture in decentralisation: The case of Zambezia, Mozambique. Progress in Development Studies, 9(1), 63–79.

2. Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., Samji, S., & Woolcock, M. (2015). Building capability by delivering results: Putting Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA) principles into practice. In A. Whaites, G. Teskey, S. Fyson, & E. Gonzalez (Eds.), A governance practitioner’s notebook: Alternative ideas and approaches (pp. 123–133). Paris: OECD.

3. Booth, D., & Unsworth, S. (2014). Politically smart, locally led development. Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/9204.pdf

4. Chatham House. (n.d.). Chatham House rule. Chatham House. Retrieved from https://www.chathamhouse.org/chatham-house-rule

5. Clinton, H. (2010). Leading through civilian power: Redefining American diplomacy and development. Foreign Affairs, 89(6), 13–24.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3