Journalist-Twitterers as Political Influencers in Brazil: Narratives and Disputes Towards a New Intermediary Model

Author:

Peres-Neto LuizORCID

Abstract

The ascendency of Jair Bolsonaro to the presidency of Brazil in 2018 put the role of traditional media companies and journalists under the spotlight. Bad news or opinions against his government have been officially treated as fake, inaccurate, or false information. In this context, data show a decrease in news trust and growing news consumption through platforms. According to the 2021 Reuters Institute report on news trust, only 21% of Brazilians trust the press as an institution, with 71% using social media platforms to be informed. As part of a broad and complex crisis of the traditional intermediary model, several journalists appeared in the Brazilian public sphere as influencers on social media platforms such as Twitter. Based on a qualitative perspective, this article aims to research the role of journalists as political influencers and their use of Twitter to express their voices. A sample of 10 journalists with more than 10,000 followers on Twitter, five working for traditional media and five from native digital media, were interviewed in depth. We realized that they use their digital capital in two political directions. On the one hand, as part of a digital strategy promoted by media outlets to gain attention and call the audience, journalists share their spots and comments on daily issues. On the other hand, in a polarized political context, journalists have found Twitter a means to express their voices in a context of increasing violence and restrictions on free expression among this collective.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Communication

Reference61 articles.

1. Almeida, R. (2019). Bolsonaro President: Conservatism, evangelism and the brazilian crisis. Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 38(1), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.25091/S01013300201900010010

2. Article 19. (2021). The global expression report 2019/2020. https://www.article19.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/GxR2019-20report.pdf

3. Bourdieu, P. (1999). Contrafuegos : Reflexiones útiles para servir a la resistencia contra la invasión neoliberal [Counterfire: Against the tyranny of the market]. Anagrama.

4. Bouvier, G., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2020). Twitter, the public sphere, and the chaos of online deliberation. In G. Bouvier & J. E. Rosenbaum (Eds.). Twitter, the public sphere, and the chaos of online deliberation (pp. 1–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4

5. Brazil: Bolsonaro blocks critics on social media. (2021, August 21). Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/08/19/brazil-bolsonaro-blocks-critics-social-media

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3