Author:
Veidemane Anete,Kaiser Frans,Craciun Daniela
Abstract
Measuring access to higher education for underrepresented groups is a relevant yet challenging task. The article shows that while social inclusion is recognised as a priority, policymakers, academics, and institutional leaders struggle to define, operationalise, and measure it. This makes answering the question of what constitutes a socially inclusive higher education institution quite difficult. While the answer to this question may be context‐specific, there is a clear need for a set of commonly defined indicators that allow higher education institutions to measure their progress throughout time and in relation to others. The article synthesises insights from policy, practise, and scientific research to identify which indicators are the most promising for assessing the access of under‐representative students to higher education. By discussing indicator relevance, validity and feasibility, the article contributes to the quest for internationally comparable social inclusion indicators of underrepresented student groups.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology
Reference32 articles.
1. Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. The American Political Science Review, 95(3), 524–546.
2. Baltaru, R. D. (2020). The rise of agentic inclusion in the UK universities: Maintaining reputation through (formal) diversification. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1739015
3. Bologna Process. (2015). Widening participation for equity and growth. A strategy for the development of the social dimension and lifelong learning in the European higher education area to 2020. EHEA. http://www.ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/2015_Yerevan/71/5/Widening_Participation_for_Equity_and_Growth_A_Strategy_for_the_Development_of_the_SD_and_LLL_in_the_EHEA_to_2020_613715.pdf
4. Bologna Process. (2020). Advisory group 1 on social dimension final report. Italian BFUG Secretariat. https://ehea2020rome.it/storage/uploads/0479534b-a889-4fd9-9d15-64b49e6ee768/AG1_Social_Dimension_Final_Report.pdf
5. Bottani, N., & Tuijnman, A. (1994). International education indicators: Framework, development and interpretation. Capítulo, 1, 21-35.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献