Abstract
Loneliness poses one of the significant problems of our modern post‐industrial societies. Current research on loneliness has been developed primarily by psychology, biomedicine, nursing, and other health‐related disciplines, showing a surprising number of variables and risk factors involved in the experience of loneliness, along with positive correlations with premature mortality and morbidity. However, most of these analyses overlook the social interactions and context in which loneliness is experienced. Drawing on a subsample (N = 24) of Spanish “mothers” from impoverished families, the article proposes a mixed‐method approach (both relational and interpretative) that may potentially complement quantitative approaches, showing relational and contextual factors that may contribute to a better understanding of the subjective dimension of loneliness.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology
Reference66 articles.
1. Ali, A., Hassiotis, A., Strydom, A., & King, M. (2012). Self‐stigma in people with intellectual disabilities and courtesy stigma in family carers: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 2122–2140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.06.013
2. Allison, A. (2013). Precarious Japan. Duke University Press.
3. Bichir, R. M., & Marques, E. (2012). Poverty and sociability in Brazilian metropolises: Comparing poor people’s personal networks in São Paulo and Salvador. Connections, 32(1), 20–32.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. Routledge.
5. Cacioppo, J. T., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2009). Alone in the crowd: The structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 977–991.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献