Affiliation:
1. Ural State University of Economics
2. Tyumen State University
Abstract
This article presents the results of a comparative analysis of the legislative approaches to the regulation of cryptocurrencies in the BRICS countries and the Eurasian Economic Union. During the analysis, regulatory legal acts and draft laws, including material on judicial practice, of the Russian Federation, China, India, Brazil, the Republic of South Africa, the Republic of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Armenia were studied. The use of a comparative-legal method makes it possible to develop recommendations about the development of legislation on the circulation of cryptocurrencies within the BRICS countries. The assessment of the experience of EEU countries, and especially that of the Republic of Belarus, has great importance since the Russian Federation is a member country of both the EEU and BRICS. Comparative analysis was achieved by taking into account such key points as the existence of a regulatory framework, regulation of transaction taxation and counteracting the legalization of profits from crime. The results of the analysis are presented for each country separately and then systematized in the form of an analytical table. Based on the analysis, three approaches to the regulation of cryptocurrencies are identified: conservative, liberal and neutral. The study of the experiences of the BRICS and EEU countries allowed the authors to conclude that these countries need to formulate similar requirements for the regulation of cryptocurrencies so as to avoid the migration of investment and capital to other countries which have a more liberal approach.
Reference7 articles.
1. Vorobey A.V. ICO as a New Form of Raising Capital, 10 Industrial and Commercial Law 22 (2017).
2. Gusarova S.A. Blockchain Technology and Cryptocurrency in BRICS Countries, 10-2(87) Economics and Entrepreneurship 80 (2017).
3. Baek C. & Elbeck M. Bitcoins as an Investment or Speculative Vehicle? A First Look, 22(1) Applied Economics Letters 30 (2014).
4. Cvetkova I. Cryptocurrencies Legal Regulation, 5(2) BRICS Law Journal 128 (2018).
5. Godsiff P. Bitcoin: Bubble or Blockchain in Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications: 9th KES International Conference, KES-AMSTA 2015 Sorrento, Italy, June 2015, Proceedings 191 (G. Jezic et al. (eds.), Cham: Springer, 2015).
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献