Affiliation:
1. Financial Research Institute under the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation
Abstract
The digitalisation of the economy has created a number of complex problems in the area of taxation. A majority of these problems relate to the issue of the distribution of taxing rights between states in the context of taxing income received as a result of crossborder activities. This article discusses the initiatives of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) regarding the taxation of international groups of companies in the era of the digital economy. It considers methodological approaches to taxation of the digital economy and highlights the features of the digitalisation of the economy that play an important role in tax policy. The study undertaken is based on a comparative legal method that allows for the examination of similar legal problems found in legislation and international treaties, as well as the identification of optimal ways to solve them. The following main problem with taxation of the digital economy is highlighted: tax systems laid down in the 1920s traditionally take into account the principles of the source of income and residency. In the new world of globalization and the digital economy, these principles have become significant obstacles to international trade. It is on this ground that the issues of the new nexus as well as the new model of allocation of taxing rights should be established. The article provides an analysis of the OECD’s two-pillar approach to these issues. Pillar 1 deals with the reallocation of profits of multinational enterprises to market jurisdictions. Pillar 2 deals with the issue of a global minimum tax. Additionally, the article discusses the various ways in which the new OECD concept could potentially be implemented in Russia.
Reference10 articles.
1. Berberov A.B., Milogolov N.S. Otsenka masshtabov problemy razmyvaniya nalogovoi bazy v Rossii // Finansovyi zhurnal. 2018. № 6. S. 47–58 [Berberov A.B. & Milogolov N.S. Assessment of the Scope of Tax Base Erosion in Russia, 6 Financial Journal 47 (2018)]. https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2018-6-47-58
2. Kotlyarov M.A., Rykova I.N. Protivodeistvie perenosu nalogovoi bazy v nizkonalogovye yurisdiktsii: opyt OESR i prioritety dlya Rossii // Finansovyi zhurnal. 2014. № 4. S. 47–54 [Kotlyarov M.A. & Rykova I.A. Prevention of Tax Base Shifting to Low-Tax Jurisdictions: OECD Experience and Priorities for Russia, 4 Financial Journal 47 (2014)].
3. Milogolov N.S., Ponomareva K.A. Mezhdunarodnaya kooperatsiya nalogovykh administratsii pri nalogooblozhenii tsifrovykh biznes-modelei: mif ili real'nost'? // Nalogi. 2021. № 3. S. 29–33 [Milogolov N.S. & Ponomareva K.A. International Cooperation of Tax Administrations in Taxing Digital Business Models: Myth or Reality?, 3 Taxes 29 (2021)].
4. Becker J. & Englisch J. Taxing Where Value Is Created: What’s ‘User Involvement’ Got to Do with It?, 47(2) Intertax 161 (2019). https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2019015
5. Devereux M.P. How Should Business Profit Be Taxed? Some Thoughts on Conceptual Developments During the Lifetime of the IFS, 40(4) Fisc. Stud. 591 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12205
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献