Features of the Application of Instrumental Methods for Lumbosacral Muscle Groups Functional State Assessing

Author:

Borodulina Irina V.1,Borodulina Irina V.2,Chesnikova Ekaterina I.2

Affiliation:

1. Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Postgraduate Education, Moscow, Russian Federation

2. National Medical Research Center of Rehabilitation and Balneology, Moscow, Russian Federation

Abstract

The use of instrumental diagnosis methods is a way to form an individual strategy of rehabilitation treatment and effectiveness monitoring. However, there is a lack of methods for objective assessment of the muscle groups’ functional state in both patients with dorsopathy and healthy individuals, as well as incorrect use of existing diagnostic tools due to the lack of the regulatory framework. The subjects had no complaints on low back pain, and there was no history of pain episodes associated with spinal pathology. All the volunteers were comparable in height and weight before being included in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the terms of the Helsinki Declaration, all subjects signed an informed consent before the start of diagnostic activities. Aim. To determine the normative values of the strength of the flexor muscle group (FM) and extensor muscles (EM) of the lumbosacral spine and to establish the ratio of the obtained results to the automatic hardware norm. Material and methods. The present clinical study included 22 healthy volunteers aged 23 to 61 years (the average age was 38.4±12.8 years), including 14 women (63.6%) and 8 men (36.4%). Results and discussion. The results obtained demonstrate that the real normative indicators for MS and MR in healthy individuals can vary in the range from the hardware norm value calculated automatically by the device to a value of 20% lower. Exceeding this parameter is not a pathological deviation. When assessing the muscle strength, a decrease in this indicator is of physiological and clinical significance, since it reflects the dysfunction of this area and is a predictor of the pain syndrome chronicity. Conclusion. The standard values findings allow us to assess correctly the initial clinical condition and use this instrumental method with biofeedback for patients with degenerative spinal lesion and non-specific pain in the lumbosacral region and patients who have undergone spinal surgery to develop individual rehabilitation programs. As a further prospect for the use of diagnostic systems with biofeedback, it is suggested that the examination plan should include the determination of the ratio of the FM strength to the EM strength, as well as the strength of the muscles involved in the lateral slopes of the trunk.

Publisher

National Medical Research Center For Rehabilitation And Balneology

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science

Reference42 articles.

1. Hoy D., Bain C., March L., Brooks P. et al. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2012; 64(6): 2028-2037. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.34347.

2. Borodulina I.V., Badalov N.G., Mukhina A.A., Guscha A.O. Otsenka effektivnosti kompleksnogo lecheniya s primeneniem ritmicheskoi transkranialnoi magnitnoi stimulyatsii i obschih gidrogalvanicheskih vann u patsientov s poyasnichno-krestsovoi radikulopatiei [Assessment of the efficiency of complex treatment with the application of rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation and general hydrohalvanical bathtubs in patients with lumbar and cross-radiculopathy]. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 201; 1(89): 33-41 (In Russ.).

3. Maher C., Underwood M., Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017; 389(10070): 736-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30970-9

4. Chenot J.F., Greitemann B., Kladny B., Petzke F., Pfingsten M., Schorr S.G. Non-Specific Low Back Pain. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2017; 114(51- 52): 883-890. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2017.0883

5. Hartvigsen J., Hancock M.J., Kongsted A., Louw Q. et al. Lancet Low Back Pain Series Working Group. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018; 391(10137): 2356-2367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3