Kitchen Bytes

Author:

Ketchum Alex

Abstract

This article discusses the history of kitchen computers and robots in the United States in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Kitchen computers are programmable devices located in kitchens that perform logical operations and are often equipped with software to aid in cooking. However, as discussed in this article, marketers and journalists tend to anthropomorphize kitchen computers in descriptions and discuss these kitchen computers as if they are robots. Robots are machines that are programmable by a computer, which can carry out a complex series of actions automatically. Kitchen robots, therefore, are related to kitchen computers yet are not the same thing. In the cultural imaginary, including in movies, television, and advertisements, kitchen robots represent the desire for leisure, luxury, and a reprieve from the burdens of cooking. However, the development of these technologies and their surrounding discourse were more complicated than films and computer magazines made them out to be. Kitchen robots and computers are typically coded as white and female. Their marketing promotes a retrofuturist vision in which outdated gender models are projected onto contemporary—or even emerging—technologies that reinscribe sexist, racist, and heterosexist stereotypes. While the promise of kitchen computers and robots seems progressive, these technologies do not threaten the gendered division of household cooking. Instead, these devices offered women a reprieve from the drudgery of kitchen tasks through a capitalist solution: a product buys a woman’s reprieve rather than upending the nuclear heterosexual family and redefining household roles that create a more equitable division of housework.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

General Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. Adams Stein, Jesse. 2011. “Domesticity, Gender and the 1977 Apple II Personal Computer.” Design and Culture3.2: 193–216. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13002771867842

2. Atkinson, Paul. 2010. “The Curious Case of the Kitchen Computer.” Journal of Design History23.2: 163–79. www.jstor.org/stable/40801931

3. Atkinson, Paul. 2015. “At the Push of a Button: The Utopian Futures of Computer-Aided Everyday Life.” In “How We Live, and How we Might Live”: Design and the Spirit of Critical Utopianism. The DHS Annual Conference. California College of the Arts, San Francisco, California, September 11–13, 2015. http://shura.shu.ac.uk/10883/1/At%20the%20Push%20of%20a%20Button%20text%20version.pdf

4. Bell, Genevieve, and JosephKaye. 2002. “Designing Technology for Domestic Space.” Gastronomica2.2: 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1525/gfc.2002.2.2.46

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Gastronomica Roundtable;Gastronomica: The Journal of Food and Culture;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3