Abstract
In this essay, prompted by the disciplinary debate over #CommunicationSoWhite in summer 2019, I reflect on my past publications in Rhetoric & Public Affairs to identify how structures of whiteness influenced the shape and acceptance of my publications. Drawing upon my self-critique, the essay provides advice for white scholars who aim to responsibly address questions of race and racism as both authors and reviewers.
Publisher
University of California Press
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Communication,Language and Linguistics
Reference25 articles.
1. Martin J. Medhurst, “Editorial,” CRTNET: Announcements, Queries, and Discussions #17193, 12 June 2019.
2. Medhurst, “Editorial.”
3. Thomas K. Nakayama and Robert L. Krizek, “Whiteness: A Strategic Rhetoric,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 81, no. 3 (1995): 299.
4. Medhurst, “Editorial.”
5. For a similar critique, see Jennifer Lyn Simpson, “Blinded by the White: Challenging the Notion of a Color-Blind Meritocracy in the Academy,” Southern Communication Journal 75, no. 2 (2010): 150–59.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献