Abstract
Although music historians have begun to consider some of the broad implications of large-scale digitization, the shift from traditional library- or archive-based methods of research to speculative Internet text searching remains largely invisible within an unchanged scholarly apparatus of footnotes and bibliographies. As a result, quirky details become easier to find, yet that ease is itself concealed, perhaps, this article argues, because to admit it might occasion a variety of academic shame.
Publisher
University of California Press
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,General Arts and Humanities,Cultural Studies,Gender Studies
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Contemporary Music and Its Futures;Contemporary Music Review;2020-03-03
2. Digital Humanities and Nineteenth Century Music: Some Perspectives and Examples from Latin America;Nineteenth-Century Music Review;2020-01-27
3. Lingold Mary Caton, Darren Mueller et Whitney Trettien (dir.), 2018, Digital Sound Studies. Durham, Londres, Duke University Press, 298 p., bibliogr., index;Anthropologie et Sociétés;2019
4. So You’ve Been Musically Shamed;Journal of Popular Music Studies;2018-09
5. Anti-Historical, but Nonetheless There… Verdi, ‘Tutte le feste’ (Gilda),Rigoletto, Act II;Cambridge Opera Journal;2016-07