Using Iterative Group Presentations in an Introductory Biology Course to Enhance Student Engagement and Critical Thinking

Author:

Aguilera Anna1,Schreier Jesse2,Saitow Cassandra3

Affiliation:

1. ANNA AGUILERA is an Assistant Professor in the Biology Department at Simmons College, Boston, MA; email: Anna.aguilera@simmons.edu.

2. JESSE SCHREIER is a Coordinator of Instructional Technology at Massasoit Community College, Brockton, MA; e-mail: jschreier@massasoit.mass.edu.

3. CASSANDRA SAITOW is an Instructor in the Biology Department at Simmons College, Boston, MA; e-mail: Cassandra.saitow@simmons.edu.

Abstract

In this study, we examined two types of group presentation assignments for use in a large, introductory biology course. Students were placed into groups of 6 to 8 members, and tasked with researching a topic and preparing a 10-minute in-class presentation. The assignments varied by course section; in the control section, each group's topics were selected to complement the course topic, whereas in the iterative sections, each group's topic would derive from the previous group's presentation. Students’ critical thinking skills were assessed before and after the semester's presentations, and exit surveys were conducted. Results show that students in the iterative group performed better than control on exam questions, and overall interest in biology was high in both groups as a result of the presentations. Overall, performing group presentations in an iterative style enhanced learning by mimicking the scientific process of inquiry and discovery.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Education

Reference15 articles.

1. Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

2. Behar-Horenstein, L. S. & Niu, L. (2011). Teaching critical thinking skills in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 8, 25–41.

3. Bensley A., & Murtagh, M. P., (2012). Guidelines for a scientific approach to critical thinking assessment. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 5–16.

4. Brookfield, S. (2012). Teaching for Critical Thinking: Tools and Techniques to help students question their assumptions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

5. Defining and Teaching Evaluative Thinking: Insights from Research on Critical Thinking;American Journal of Evaluation,2015

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Supporting peer evaluation of student-generated content: a study of three approaches;Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education;2021-12-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3