Affiliation:
1. GILLIAN PUTTICK and BRIAN DRAYTON colead the Life Sciences Initiative at TERC, a nonprofit education R&D institution at 2067 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02140; e-mail: gilly_puttick@terc.edu and brian_drayton@terc.edu.
2. ELIZA COHEN, soon to graduate from Brown University, is a Research Assistant; e-mail: eliza.dexter.cohen@gmail.com.
Abstract
We analyzed the practitioner literature on lab-based instruction in biology in The American Biology Teacher between 2007 and 2012. We investigated what laboratory learning looks like in biology classrooms, what topics are addressed, what instructional methods and activities are described, and what is being learned about student outcomes. The practitioner literature reveals a focus on novel and innovative labs, and gaps in some biology topics. There is little description of student learning, but motivation and engagement are a primary concern of authors. There is little evidence of students addressing the nature of science in laboratories, and too few opportunities for authentic exploration of phenomena. We suggest that biology instruction can be strengthened by more rigorous practitioner research through increased professional collaboration between teachers and education researchers, increased focus on the synergy between content and teaching practice, and more rigor in reporting student outcomes.
Publisher
University of California Press
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Education
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献