Reconsidering astronomy textbooks’ concept about the cause of sun’s gravitational force: A comparison to quasar

Abstract

Abstract All astronomy textbooks tell that a quasar has different gravitational force generator compared to sun. A quasar consists of gaseous matter surrounds supermassive black hole. The black hole generates an enormous gravitational force that binds galaxies around. Though on smaller scale, our sun also has strong gravitational force. However, the gravitational force is believed merely comes from sun’s huge mass instead of an existed black hole inside like quasar. Conversely, this paper confirms that the conviction needs to be reviewed. The particles shift postulate (which was obtained through Heisenberg’s uncertainty and wave-particle duality interpretation) and thermal expansion principle denoted that celestial bodies’ gravitational forces depend on their bodies’ temperatures. The hotter their bodies, the weaker their gravitational forces. Hence, sun must have weaker gravitational force compared to planets around it because sun is hotter than them, though it has a huge mass. The planets attract sun by their stronger gravitational forces, while sun itself, considering its endurance from being disunited caused by nuclear fusion and collision among hot molecules, is suspected has immense gravitational force at the core that attracts its body inward. Therefore, sun’s body is attracted inward and outward, yield a binding that creates balance among celestial bodies of our solar system. According to the postulate and principle before, the immense gravitational force inside sun can only be generated by an extremely cold body, allegedly a black hole. As a consequence, we now describe our sun’s structure as a black hole surrounded by gaseous matter, a characteristic that also possessed by quasars. This argument still needs to be verified, but at least gives a new point of view for scholars.