Simple and statistically sound recommendations for analysing physical theories

Author:

AbdusSalam Shehu S,Agocs Fruzsina J,Allanach Benjamin C,Athron PeterORCID,Balázs CsabaORCID,Bagnaschi Emanuele,Bechtle Philip,Buchmueller Oliver,Beniwal Ankit,Bhom Jihyun,Bloor Sanjay,Bringmann Torsten,Buckley Andy,Butter Anja,Camargo-Molina José Eliel,Chrzaszcz Marcin,Conrad Jan,Cornell Jonathan M,Danninger Matthias,de Blas Jorge,De Roeck Albert,Desch Klaus,Dolan Matthew,Dreiner Herbert,Eberhardt Otto,Ellis John,Farmer Ben,Fedele Marco,Flächer Henning,Fowlie AndrewORCID,Gonzalo Tomás E,Grace Philip,Hamer Matthias,Handley Will,Harz Julia,Heinemeyer Sven,Hoof SebastianORCID,Hotinli Selim,Jackson Paul,Kahlhoefer Felix,Kowalska Kamila,Krämer Michael,Kvellestad Anders,Martinez Miriam Lucio,Mahmoudi Farvah,Santos Diego Martinez,Martinez Gregory D,Mishima Satoshi,Olive Keith,Paul Ayan,Prim Markus Tobias,Porod Werner,Raklev Are,Renk Janina J,Rogan Christopher,Roszkowski Leszek,Ruiz de Austri Roberto,Sakurai Kazuki,Scaffidi Andre,Scott Pat,Sessolo Enrico Maria,Stefaniak Tim,Stöcker Patrick,Su Wei,Trojanowski Sebastian,Trotta Roberto,Sming Tsai Yue-Lin,Van den Abeele Jeriek,Valli Mauro,Vincent Aaron C,Weiglein Georg,White Martin,Wienemann Peter,Wu Lei,Zhang Yang

Abstract

Abstract Physical theories that depend on many parameters or are tested against data from many different experiments pose unique challenges to statistical inference. Many models in particle physics, astrophysics and cosmology fall into one or both of these categories. These issues are often sidestepped with statistically unsound ad hoc methods, involving intersection of parameter intervals estimated by multiple experiments, and random or grid sampling of model parameters. Whilst these methods are easy to apply, they exhibit pathologies even in low-dimensional parameter spaces, and quickly become problematic to use and interpret in higher dimensions. In this article we give clear guidance for going beyond these procedures, suggesting where possible simple methods for performing statistically sound inference, and recommendations of readily-available software tools and standards that can assist in doing so. Our aim is to provide any physicists lacking comprehensive statistical training with recommendations for reaching correct scientific conclusions, with only a modest increase in analysis burden. Our examples can be reproduced with the code publicly available at Zenodo.

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3