Revenue use and public support for a carbon tax

Author:

Nowlin Matthew CORCID,Gupta Kuhika,Ripberger Joseph TORCID

Abstract

Abstract Many experts see carbon pricing as an effective way to reduce emissions of greenhouses gases; however, political and public support for carbon pricing has faltered. Recent research indicates that revenue recycling and policy design options may induce public support for carbon pricing, but does not examine change in support as a result of revenue use or possible heterogeneity in these inducements across partisan groups. Does support for a carbon tax shift significantly once revenue uses are discussed? Do conservatives and Republicans and liberals and Democrats respond to different revenue reuse options when formulating opinions about carbon taxation? This study employs a survey experiment to examine these questions. Key results indicate that support shifts are largest when the revenue would be refunded and conservatives and Republicans are responsive to different revenue usage options. Specifically, conservatives and Republicans are more supportive of a carbon tax when revenues go towards a tax rebate or deficit reduction. While the differences are relatively small and variable (uncertain), these results provide suggestive insight into the policy design options that may induce a bipartisan basis of public support for carbon taxation policies.

Funder

Center for Public Choice and Market Process at the College of Charleston

Center for Energy, Security and Society at the University of Oklahoma

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Environmental Science,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Reference35 articles.

1. The promise and problems of pricing carbon theory and experience;Aldy;J. Environ. Develop.,2012

2. Public views on a carbon tax depend on the proposed use of revenue;Amdur,2014

3. Market failure, government failure and externalities in climate change mitigation: the case for a carbon tax;Andrew;Public Admin. Dev.,2008

4. Combating global climate change: why a carbon tax is a better response to global warming than cap and trade;Avi-Yonah;Stanford Environ. Law J.,2009

5. Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data;Baranzini;Environ. Econ. Policy Studies,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3