Abstract
Abstract
Many experts see carbon pricing as an effective way to reduce emissions of greenhouses gases; however, political and public support for carbon pricing has faltered. Recent research indicates that revenue recycling and policy design options may induce public support for carbon pricing, but does not examine change in support as a result of revenue use or possible heterogeneity in these inducements across partisan groups. Does support for a carbon tax shift significantly once revenue uses are discussed? Do conservatives and Republicans and liberals and Democrats respond to different revenue reuse options when formulating opinions about carbon taxation? This study employs a survey experiment to examine these questions. Key results indicate that support shifts are largest when the revenue would be refunded and conservatives and Republicans are responsive to different revenue usage options. Specifically, conservatives and Republicans are more supportive of a carbon tax when revenues go towards a tax rebate or deficit reduction. While the differences are relatively small and variable (uncertain), these results provide suggestive insight into the policy design options that may induce a bipartisan basis of public support for carbon taxation policies.
Funder
Center for Public Choice and Market Process at the College of Charleston
Center for Energy, Security and Society at the University of Oklahoma
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Environmental Science,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference35 articles.
1. The promise and problems of pricing carbon theory and experience;Aldy;J. Environ. Develop.,2012
2. Public views on a carbon tax depend on the proposed use of revenue;Amdur,2014
3. Market failure, government failure and externalities in climate change mitigation: the case for a carbon tax;Andrew;Public Admin. Dev.,2008
4. Combating global climate change: why a carbon tax is a better response to global warming than cap and trade;Avi-Yonah;Stanford Environ. Law J.,2009
5. Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data;Baranzini;Environ. Econ. Policy Studies,2017
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献