Abstract
AbstractSince public support is critical for implementing carbon pricing policies, we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the survey-based literature on change in public support for direct and indirect carbon pricing policies with and without revenue recycling options. Following a comprehensive and transparent machine-learning assisted screening of the literature, our dataset comprises 35 studies containing 70 surveys across 26 countries with over 100,000 respondents. We find that the introduction of any type of revenue recycling option increases public support for carbon pricing. Results from our meta-regression indicate that green spending (i.e. using revenues for climate-friendly projects) is the only revenue recycling option associated with a statistically significant increase in public support. Our findings moreover suggest that the effects may depend on which region the survey was carried out, highlighting the need for additional research in countries in the regions of Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean.
Funder
Heinrich Böll Stiftung
EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
International Development Research Centre
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Baranzini, A. & Carattini, S. Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 19, 197–227 (2017).
2. High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. (2017).
3. Klenert, D. et al. Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 669–677 (2018).
4. Pigou, A. The Economics of Welfare. (Macmillan, 1920).
5. Baranzini, A., Goldemberg, J. & Speck, S. A future for carbon taxes. Ecol. Econ. 32, 395–412 (2000).