On the consistency of ΛCDM with CMB measurements in light of the latest Planck, ACT and SPT data

Author:

Calderon RodrigoORCID,Shafieloo ArmanORCID,Kumar Hazra DhirajORCID,Sohn WuhyunORCID

Abstract

AbstractUsing Gaussian Processes we perform a thorough, non-parametric consistency test of the ΛCDM model when confronted with state-of-the-art TT, TE, and EE measurements of the anisotropies in the Cosmic Microwave Background by thePlanck, ACT, and SPT collaborations. Using ΛCDM's best-fit predictions to the TTTEEE data fromPlanck, we find no statistically significant deviations when looking for signatures in the residuals across the different datasets. The results of SPT are in good agreement with the ΛCDM best-fit predictions to thePlanckdata, while the results of ACT are only marginally consistent. However, when using the best-fit predictions to CamSpec — a recent reanalysis of thePlanckdata — as the mean function, we find larger discrepancies between the datasets. Our analysis also reveals an interesting feature in the polarisation (EE) measurements from the CamSpec analysis, which could be explained by a slight underestimation of the covariance matrix. Interestingly, the disagreement between CamSpec andPlanck/ACT is mainly visible in the residuals of the TT spectrum, the latter favoring a scale-invariant tiltns≃ 1, which is consistent with previous findings from parametric analyses. We also report some features in the EE measurements captured both by ACT and SPT which are independent of the chosen mean function and could be hinting towards a common physical origin. For completeness, we repeat our analysis using the best-fit spectra to ACT+WMAP as the mean function. Finally, we test the internal consistency of thePlanckdata alone by studying the high and low-ℓ ranges separately, finding no discrepancy between small and large angular scales.

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Subject

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3