Author:
Zarantonello Lia,Luomala Harri T.
Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to advance theory‐building in the area of food consumption research, by exploring how consumers experience chocolate consumption in different contexts and by viewing these inductive findings in the light of the relevant existing body of knowledge.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative study is conducted on a non‐student sample of Italian consumers. The qualitative diary research technique is used as it is particularly suitable to capturing sensations, feelings, thoughts, and behaviours related to various chocolate consumption contexts. Content analytical and interpretive principles are followed in the production of the study findings.FindingsChocolate generates rich and complex consumption experiences as a function of various contextual forces. Seven main contextual chocolate consumption categories are identified: context of physiological need, context of sensorial gratification, context of memories and nostalgia, context of escapism, context of materialism, context of chocoholism, and context of interpersonal and self‐gifts. On the basis of these chocolate consumption categories and ideas from past consumer behaviour research, four more general contextualized chocolate consumption experience types are extracted: chocolate consumption experience as medicine, as mind manoeuvring, as regression and as ritual enhancement.Originality/valuePast research has not explored how different chocolate consumption contexts shape and define these experiences, even though contextual variation in food consumption experiences is recognized as important. The nuances of chocolate consumption in various contexts are explored to the unprecedented depth, a conceptually novel typology of contextualized chocolate consumption experiences is presented, the field of application of self‐congruity theory is expanded and the profiles of chocolate consumer segments identified by past research are enriched.
Reference77 articles.
1. Ackerman, D., MacInnis, D. and Folkes, V. (2000), “Social comparisons of possessions: when it feels good and when it feels bad”, in Hoch, S.J. and Meyer, R.J. (Eds), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 27, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, pp. 173‐8.
2. Alaszewski, A. (2006), Using Diaries for Social Research, Sage, London.
3. Allen, M.W. and Wilson, M. (2005), “Materialism and food security”, Appetite, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 314‐23.
4. Allen, M.W., Gupta, R. and Monnier, A. (2008), “The interactive effect of cultural symbols and human values on taste evaluation”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 294‐308.
5. Allison, S. and Timmerman, G.M. (2007), “Anatomy of a binge: food environment and characteristics of nonpurge binge episodes”, Eating Behaviors, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 31‐8.
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献