Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to investigate and review how the practices of Lesson Study fare in enhancing the professional capabilities of mathematics teachers when introduced as part of a pilot project in reforming the post-primary mathematics curriculum in Ireland.
Design/methodology/approach
– Totally, 250 mathematics teachers teaching Junior and Senior Cycle mathematics in 24 post-primary schools constitute the population of this study. The schools which participated are representative of the range of all post-primary schools in Ireland.
Findings
– Lesson Study has an important role to play in the continuing professional development of teachers in the 24 post-primary schools and beyond in Ireland. An investigation of the maths teachers’ engagement with Lesson Study reveals some considerable initial resistance. Reasons for this resistance are examined and the lessons learned from the steps taken to deal with this are reviewed. Lesson Study is an innovation that teachers need to understand deeply and to practice regularly through mutual support if they are to avail of it fruitfully. Accordingly, further approaches need to be explored, not least the important role of school leadership, to adapt Lesson Study more fully and more productively to the professional cultures of teaching in Ireland.
Originality/value
– An analytic and evaluative account of the challenges and complexities involved in introducing Lesson Study to post-primary schools in Ireland is presented for the first time.
Reference47 articles.
1. Beijaard, D.
and
de Vries, Y.
(1997), “Building expertise: a process perspective on the development or change of teachers’ beliefs”, European Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 243-255.
2. Birman, B.
,
Desimone, L.
,
Porter, A.
and
Garet, M.
(2000), “Designing professional development that works”, Educational Leadership, Vol. 57 No. 8, pp. 28-33.
3. Brosnan, A.
(2008), “The teaching of mathematics at post-primary level in Ireland: a review of traditional patterns and an exploration of future practices”, unpublished doctoral thesis, National University of Ireland, Maynooth.
4. Çetinkaya, B.
(2012), “Understanding teachers in the midst of reform: teachers’ concerns about reformed sixth grade mathematics curriculum in Turkey”, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 155-166.
5. Chapman, O.
(1999), “Inservice teacher development in mathematical problem solving”, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 121-142.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献