Author:
Tetteh Godson A.,Amoako-Gyampah Kwasi,Kwarteng Amoako
Abstract
Purpose
Several research studies on Lean Six Sigma (LSS) have been done using the survey methodology. However, the use of surveys often relies on the measurement of variables, which cannot be directly observed, with attendant measurement errors. The purpose of this study is to develop a methodological framework consisting of a combination of four tools for identifying and assessing measurement error during survey research.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper evaluated the viability of the framework through an experimental study on the assessment of project management success in a developing country environment. The research design combined a control group, pretest and post-test measurements with structural equation modeling that enabled the assessment of differences between honest and fake survey responses. This paper tested for common method variance (CMV) using the chi-square test for the difference between unconstrained and fully constrained models.
Findings
The CMV results confirmed that there was significant shared variance among the different measures allowing us to distinguish between trait and faking responses and ascertain how much of the observed process measurement is because of measurement system variation as opposed to variation arising from the study’s constructs.
Research limitations/implications
The study was conducted in one country, and hence, the results may not be generalizable.
Originality/value
Measurement error during survey research, if not properly addressed, can lead to incorrect conclusions that can harm theory development. It can also lead to inappropriate recommendations for practicing managers. This study provides findings from a framework developed and assessed in a LSS project environment for identifying faking responses. This paper provides a robust framework consisting of four tools that provide guidelines on distinguishing between fake and trait responses. This tool should be of great value to researchers.
Reference125 articles.
1. Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process;International Journal of Project Management,2011
2. Intertemporal labor supply and long-term employment contracts;American Economic Review,1987
3. On the covariance structure of earnings and hours changes;Econometrica,1989
4. Interviewer training guidelines of multinational survey programs: a total survey error perspective;Methods, Data, Analyses,2020
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献