Conflicting factors when implementing a statutory quality management system within the public sector: a study in Sweden

Author:

Eriksson MariaORCID,Eriksson ThereseORCID,Jonsson Elisabet

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to explore and develop knowledge about implementing and applying a quality management system (QMS) in the public sector.Design/methodology/approachA study was conducted including 16 qualitative in-depth interviews with 18 respondents, all working with QMSs in the Swedish public sector.FindingsThe study identified five main themes that are problematic in relation to the implementation of the statutory QMS in the public sector. The identified themes show that there exists a gap between theory and practice regarding how the statutory QMS needs to be implemented and applied.Practical implicationsBased on the analysis of the findings, the authors propose a model of core values and supporting elements for QMS in the public sector to bridge the gap between theory and practice.Originality/valueThe study identified problems when implementing statutory QMSs in the public sector and presents a model of improvement. Further research is needed regarding statutory QMS in the public sector.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference64 articles.

1. Key factors predicting effectiveness of cultural change and improved productivity in implementing total quality management;International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management,1999

2. All European Academies (2018), “Den europeiska kodexen för forskningens integritet. ALLEA”, available at: https://www.vr.se/download/18.7f26360d16642e3af99e94/1540219023679/SW_ALLEA_Den_europeiska_kodexen_f%C3%B6r_forskningens_integritet_digital_FINAL.pdf.

3. The impact of New Public Management on efficiency: an analysis of Madrid's hospitals;Health Policy,2015

4. An exploratory study of common issues and key differences between the European Foundation for Quality Management and the United Arab Emirates Public Sector Excellence Model: public sector organisation results;International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3