Learning organisation review – a “good” theory perspective

Author:

Santa Mijalce

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to perform integrative literature review of the learning organisation (LO) concept, on the basis of the results of the literature review to assess the concept on the principles of “good” theory, and provide future avenues for LO concept clarification and development. Design/methodology/approach – The “good” theory properties approach is used to present, synthesise and discuss studies that focus on the LO. The paper reviews in more detail the definitions (Who? and What?), the domain (When? and Where?), the relationships (How? and Why?) and the predictions by the LO theory (Would? Should? and Could?). Findings – The review revealed that the LO violates the properties of the “good” theory, especially the definitions’ and relationships’ properties. As a result, it is suggested for the research in the future to be focused on creation of formal conceptual definitions, development of ontology as a base for clarification of the relationship property and improve the instruments for measurement of the LO. Originality/value – Previously published literature reviews have advanced the clarification of the LO concept. However, there remains a need for evaluation of the concept in light of approach to concept formation. By using the “good” theory approach, this paper identified the shortcomings and laid down the ground for future research that will improve the LO concept.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education

Reference114 articles.

1. Ali, A.K. (2012), “Academic staff’s perceptions of characteristics of learning organization in a higher learning institution”, The International Journal of Educational Management , Vol. 26 No. 1, p. 55.

2. Argyris, C. (1999), On Organizational Learning , 2nd ed., Wiley-Blackwell.

3. Bacharach, S.B. (1989), “Organizational theories: some criteria for evaluation”, The Academy of Management Review , Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 496-515.

4. Bennett, J.K. and O’Brien, M.J. (1994), “The building blocks of the learning organization”, Training , Vol. 31 No. 6, p. 41.

5. Blackman, D. and Henderson, S. (2005), “Why learning organisations do not transform”, The Learning Organization , Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 42-56.

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3