Studying institutional work in organizations

Author:

Bjerregaard Toke

Abstract

PurposeIn order to provide new and other directions to institutional studies in organization theory, Lawrence and Suddaby forward the notion of institutional work of actors aimed at maintaining, changing and disrupting institutions. The purpose of this paper is to further theory and method in studying the institutional work of people in organizations.Design/methodology/approachMethodological insights from the ways in which theories of human agency in institutional contexts have co‐evolved with field study methodologies are analyzed in related fields of research, particularly in sociology and anthropology.FindingsThe ways have been analyzed in which social theories of human agency in institutional contexts and field methodology have co‐evolved in an inter‐disciplinary perspective. The analysis shows how field methodologies may provide inspirations to theory and method in studying institutional work.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings suggest that institutional organization research may prosper by grounding the study of institutional work on ethnographic methodologies.Originality/valueThis paper contributes methodological inspirations to studying organizational actors' work with accomplishing change and stability, which constitutes a comparatively underexplored line of inquiry in organizational institutionalism.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference112 articles.

1. Anderson, N. (1923), The Hobo: The Sociology of the Homeless Man, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

2. Appadurai, A. (1996), Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.

3. Barley, S.R. (2008), “Coalface institutionalism”, in Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R. and Sahlin, K. (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, Sage, London, pp. 419‐518.

4. Barley, S.R. and Tolbert, P.S. (1997), “Institutionalization and structuration: studying the links between action and institution”, Organization Studies, Vol. 18, pp. 93‐117.

5. Barth, F. (1966), “Models of social organization – the explanations of social forms”, Occasional Paper 23, Royal Anthropological Institute, London.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3