Author:
Hawkins Matthew A.,Saleem Fathima Z.
Abstract
PurposeStories draw meaning from narratives. The resulting narrative component in a story is entirely personal or contains fragments of organizational and/or societal narratives. Therefore, understanding how stories obtain these narrative fragments is critical to offering valid interpretations of narratives based on stories. In an effort to advance narrative research, the purpose of this paper is to address this fundamental question: How do stories obtain their reflected narrative fragments? Without a firm understanding of how stories draw meaning from narratives, the critical role of disentangling compound narratives from stories – interpretation – remains suspect.Design/methodology/approachThe findings are drawn from extant research and prior conceptualizations, and the story formulation model is introduced.FindingsThrough the introduction of the story formulation model, it is shown that personal narratives are omnipresent within collective narratives. Additionally, the analysis indicates there are two stages in which narrative interaction occurs, during the formulation of stories and during the formulation of narratives.Originality/valueThe findings have significant impact on the interpretation of stories, as well as furthering the understanding of how stories draw their meaning from narratives. In particular, the omnipresence of personal narratives within stories is particularly relevant for interpreting stories and narratives. Therefore, this paper offers a framework in which to conceptualize the story formulation process and contributes to story and narrative analysis research methodologies.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference54 articles.
1. Atkinson, P. and Delamont, S. (2005), “Analytic perspectives”, in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (Eds), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 821‐40.
2. Babsøll, T. (2012), “Legitimate peripheral irritations: the ethos of critique and the scholarship of integration in the study of sensemaking”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 25 No. 2.
3. Bartel, C.A. and Garud, R. (2009), “The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation”, Organization Science, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 107‐17.
4. Boje, D. (2001), Narrative Methods for Organizational and Communication Research, Sage Publications, London.
5. Boje, D., Roile, G. and Gardner, C. (2004), “Antenarratives, narratives and anaemic stories”, paper presented at all Academy Symposium Louisiana, New Orleans, LA.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献