Diplomatics of born digital documents – considering documentary form in a digital environment

Author:

Rogers Corinne

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to explore a new model of “record” that maps traditional attributes of a record onto a technical decomposition of digital records. It compares the core characteristics necessary to call a digital object a “record” in terms of diplomatics or “evidence” in terms of digital forensics. It then isolates three layers of abstraction: the conceptual, the logical and the physical. By identifying the essential elements of a record at each layer of abstraction, a diplomatics of digital records can be proposed. Design/methodology/approach – Digital diplomatics, a research outcome of the International Research on Permanent Authentic Records in Electronic Systems (InterPARES) project, gives archivists a methodology for analyzing the identity and integrity of digital records in electronic systems and thereby assessing their authenticity (Duranti and Preston, 2008; Duranti, 2005) and tracing their provenance. Findings – Digital records consist of user-generated data (content), system-generated metadata identifying source and location, application-generated metadata managing the look and performance of the record (e.g., native file format), application-generated metadata describing the data (e.g., file system metadata OS), and user-generated metadata describing the data. Digital diplomatics, based on a foundation of traditional diplomatic principles, can help identify digital records through their metadata and determine what metadata needs to be captured, managed and preserved. Originality/value – The value and originality of this paper is in the application of diplomatic principles to a deconstructed, technical view of digital records through functional metadata for assessing the identity and authenticity of digital records.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Management Information Systems

Reference32 articles.

1. Boyle, L. (1992), “Diplomatics”, in Powell, and J.M. (Ed.), Medieval Studies: An Introduction , Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New York, NY, pp. 82-113.

2. Cohen, F. (2011), Digital Forensic Evidence Examination , 3rd ed., Fred Cohen and Associates, Livermore, CA.

3. Cohen, F. (2012), The Future of Digital Forensics , presented at the Trust and Conflicting Rights in the Digital Environment, Vancouver, BC.

4. Diamond, E. (1994), “The archivist as forensic scientist – seeing ourselves in a different way”, Archivaria , Vol. 38 (Fall), pp. 139-154.

5. Duranti, L. (1998), Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science , Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3