Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to reflect a critical perspective drawing from phenomenology, especially informed by a reading of Heidegger, to enhance and extend appreciation of the need to question accounting’s meaning or delineation and how research might be undertaken into the accounting phenomenon and related areas.
Design/methodology/approach
To illustrate and clarify argumentation in terms of accounting mobilization and the domain of accounting research, the mainstream and strongly positivistic accounting perspective adopted in the USA is critically assessed. At the same time, the authors elaborate how much of interpretive research (including much of that labeled critical) is also lacking in terms of the perspective articulated here.
Findings
The paper stresses the case for questioning the taken-for-granted and conventional. It promotes reflexivity, cautious pragmatism, attentiveness to the value of the existing, responsibility to difference and otherness and openness to new possibilities as part of a deeper critical orientation.
Originality/value
The paper draws from phenomenology, especially in Heideggerian terms to open-up new conversational domain to debate accounting.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference124 articles.
1. The future of interpretive accounting research – a polyphonic debate;Critical Perspectives on Accounting,2008
2. Rhetoric and the radically chic: how arguments about academic accounting fall off the runway;Critical Perspectives on Accounting,2004
3. Letting the chat out of the bag: deconstruction, privilege and accounting research;Accounting, Organizations & Society,1989
4. Accounting as a human practice: the appeal of other voices;Accounting, Organizations & Society,1993
5. The rhetoric and rationality of accounting research;Accounting, Organizations & Society,1992
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献