Author:
Hofmann Melissa A.,Yang Sharon Q.
Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to determine the current usage of next generation online public access catalogs (OPACs) and discovery tools in academic libraries in the USA and Canada.Design/methodology/approachUsing the same random sample of 260 colleges and universities in the USA and Canada from their original study, the authors revisited each institution's library web page to ascertain whether the OPAC interface(s) offered were the same or different than in their initial data collection. Data was collected and analyzed in October and November 2011.FindingsDiscovery tool use has practically doubled in the last two years, from 16 percent to 29 percent. A total of 96 percent of academic libraries using discovery tools still provide access to their legacy catalog. The percentage of institutions using ILS OPACs with faceted navigation has increased from 2 percent to 4 percent. Combining the use of discovery tools and faceted OPACs, at least 33 percent of academic libraries are now using a faceted interface. Discovery tools that aim to be the “single point of entry for all library resources” are the most recently popular.Research limitations/implicationsAbout 16 percent of the institutions (n=43) in the sample either did not have web sites or did not provide access to their online catalogs. Thus, some data might be underreported.Practical implicationsThe findings identify trends that may inform academic libraries in the quest to providing next generation interfaces to their varied resources.Originality/valueThis study gives a timely update of next generation catalog (NGC) and discovery tool usage in academic libraries in the USA and Canada.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference16 articles.
1. Anderson, J.D. and Hofmann, M.A. (2006), “A fully faceted syntax for Library of Congress Subject Headings”, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 7‐37.
2. Becher, M. and Schmidt, K. (2011), “Taking discovery systems for a test drive”, Journal of Web Librarianship, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 199‐219.
3. Breeding, M. (2005), “Plotting a new course for metasearch”, Computers in Libraries, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 27‐9.
4. Creative Research Systems (2010), “Sample size calculator”, available at: www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm (accessed 20 April 2010).
5. Emanuel, J. (2011), “Usability of the VuFind next‐generation online catalog”, Information Technology & Libraries, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 44‐52.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献