Author:
Richardson Gregory R.A.,Lynes Jennifer K.
Abstract
PurposeTo explore the barriers and motivations to the construction of green buildings at the University of Waterloo (UW) by documenting and analysing the UW building process.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted 13 semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with key UW individuals as well as analyzing numerous internal reports in order to document UW's building process. Based on the literature, a set of key ingredients for successful green building projects is developed as a basis from which to evaluate UW's current practices.FindingsBased on the four key ingredients needs for successful green building projects at Institutions of Higher Education (IHE), UW was found to have weaknesses in all four areas including: a lack internal leadership amongst stakeholders with decision‐making power, a lack of quantifiable sustainability targets, an operational structure that does not reward building designs with lower energy costs, and lack of communication between professional designers, facilities management and faculty. While UW has implemented many green initiatives on campus, the current financial and organizational structure of the University's current system does lend itself to the creation and implementation of green buildings on campus.Originality/valueMost research at IHE document existing green building initiatives and the lessons learned from their design and construction. There has been limited research into the processes by which decisions to proceed with the construction of green buildings are made, particularly within large institutions. As a consequence, the research documents many of the pitfalls, traps, and solutions that are experienced during the construction of green buildings, but have limited knowledge of the reasons why some proposed green buildings never get developed. This research identifies barriers to the construction of green buildings within institutional decision‐making processes and makes specific recommendations for realizing green building construction based on the UW case study.
Subject
Education,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference28 articles.
1. Bartlett, E. and Howard, N. (2000), “Informing the decision makers on the cost and value of green building”, Building Research and Information, Vol. 28 Nos 5/6, pp. 315‐24.
2. Beaudoin, M. and Tremblay, L. (2002), “Specifying green buildings. The owner‐occupant's perspective”, paper presented at Sustainable Buildings Conference, Oslo.
3. Bordass, B. (2000), “Cost and value: fact and fiction”, Building, Research and Information, Vol. 28 Nos 5/6, pp. 338‐52.
4. CAUT (2005), Students, 2005 CAUT Almanac of Post‐Secondary Education in Canada, 4th ed., Canadian Association of University Teachers, Ottawa, available at: www.caut.ca/en/publications/almanac/.
5. Georg, S. and Füssel, L. (2000), “Making sense of greening and organizational change”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 175‐85.
Cited by
97 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献