Institutional motivations and barriers to the construction of green buildings on campus

Author:

Richardson Gregory R.A.,Lynes Jennifer K.

Abstract

PurposeTo explore the barriers and motivations to the construction of green buildings at the University of Waterloo (UW) by documenting and analysing the UW building process.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted 13 semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with key UW individuals as well as analyzing numerous internal reports in order to document UW's building process. Based on the literature, a set of key ingredients for successful green building projects is developed as a basis from which to evaluate UW's current practices.FindingsBased on the four key ingredients needs for successful green building projects at Institutions of Higher Education (IHE), UW was found to have weaknesses in all four areas including: a lack internal leadership amongst stakeholders with decision‐making power, a lack of quantifiable sustainability targets, an operational structure that does not reward building designs with lower energy costs, and lack of communication between professional designers, facilities management and faculty. While UW has implemented many green initiatives on campus, the current financial and organizational structure of the University's current system does lend itself to the creation and implementation of green buildings on campus.Originality/valueMost research at IHE document existing green building initiatives and the lessons learned from their design and construction. There has been limited research into the processes by which decisions to proceed with the construction of green buildings are made, particularly within large institutions. As a consequence, the research documents many of the pitfalls, traps, and solutions that are experienced during the construction of green buildings, but have limited knowledge of the reasons why some proposed green buildings never get developed. This research identifies barriers to the construction of green buildings within institutional decision‐making processes and makes specific recommendations for realizing green building construction based on the UW case study.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Education,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference28 articles.

1. Bartlett, E. and Howard, N. (2000), “Informing the decision makers on the cost and value of green building”, Building Research and Information, Vol. 28 Nos 5/6, pp. 315‐24.

2. Beaudoin, M. and Tremblay, L. (2002), “Specifying green buildings. The owner‐occupant's perspective”, paper presented at Sustainable Buildings Conference, Oslo.

3. Bordass, B. (2000), “Cost and value: fact and fiction”, Building, Research and Information, Vol. 28 Nos 5/6, pp. 338‐52.

4. CAUT (2005), Students, 2005 CAUT Almanac of Post‐Secondary Education in Canada, 4th ed., Canadian Association of University Teachers, Ottawa, available at: www.caut.ca/en/publications/almanac/.

5. Georg, S. and Füssel, L. (2000), “Making sense of greening and organizational change”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 175‐85.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3