Do national cultures matter in the containment of COVID-19?

Author:

Cao CongORCID,Li Ning,Liu LiORCID

Abstract

PurposeThis paper empirically investigates how cultural variations in individualism and tightness affected the containment of COVID-19 using data from 54 nations during a 30-day period of government intervention.Design/methodology/approachThe authors utilized the hierarchical regression approach to check the effects of three cultural variables – the individualism measure, taken from Hofstede’s six-dimension national culture index, and the measure of cultural tightness, based on the three tightness–looseness indexes calculated by Irem Uz (2015) and their interaction – on the changes in the prevalence rate (ΔPR) and crude mortality rate (ΔCMR) and case fatality rate (CFR) while controlling for the stringency of government responses to COVID-19, median age and population density.FindingsSignificant relationships were found between cultural variables and national performance in slowing the spread of the coronavirus, measured by ΔPR, ΔCMR and CFR. After controlling for the stringency of government responses, median age and population density, the authors found that cultural tightness and individualism as well as their interactions remain to be pivotal. Loose and individualistic cultures led to faster increases in PR and CMR and higher CFR. A four-quadrant conceptual framework is developed to categorize and discuss the national differences.Originality/valueThe paper integrated two constructs – cultural tightness–looseness and individualism–collectivism – to form a theoretical lens to guide the authors’ analyses while using the real-time COVID-19 data as a natural experiment for theorizing and testing. This study’s findings have significant policy implications in government responses, strategic planning, cultural adaptability and policy implementations for the world’s continuous battle against the pandemic.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science

Reference46 articles.

1. Cultural tightness–looseness and perceptions of effective leadership;Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2016

2. Alekseyeva, A. (2017), “Constructing soviet domesticity and managing everyday life from khrushchev to collapse”, in Roberts, G.H. (Ed.), Material Culture in Russia and the USSR: Things, Values, Identities, Bloomsbury Publishing, New York, NY, pp. 55-69.

3. Boulhol, H. and de Serres, A. (2010), “The impact of economic geography on GDP per capita in OECD countries”, in van Bergeijk, P.A.G. and Brakman, S. (Eds), The Gravity Model in International Trade, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 323-353.

4. Effects of cultural tightness and collectivism on self-concept and causal attributions;Cross-Cultural Research,2000

5. Coproducing responses to COVID‐19 with community‐based organizations: lessons from Zhejiang province, China;Public Administration Review,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3