Abstract
PurposeThe study investigates the nature of an understudied yet salient relationship between perceived overqualification (POQ) and work alienation in project management. It employs relative deprivation theory to propose two dimensions of the psychological contract, i.e. relational and transactional, as underlying mediating mechanisms and how empowering leadership mitigates the adverse effects of POQ.Design/methodology/approachTo this end, in two waves, we surveyed 232 project members of three public-sector information and communication technologies (ICT) projects in Punjab, Pakistan. The data was analyzed using Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).FindingsThe key findings are: (1) POQ leads to work alienation, (2) relational and transactional contracts mediate this relationship, and (3) empowering leadership can mitigate the adverse effects of POQ in project management settings.Originality/valueThis research adds valuable insights to the scant POQ literature in public-sector project management settings. It also contributes by identifying the mediating role of relational and transactional psychological contracts and the moderating role of empowering leadership to mitigate the adverse effects of POQ in these settings.
Reference108 articles.
1. Leaving Hong Kong?: the roles of attitude, subjective norm, perceived control, social identity and relative deprivation;International Journal of Intercultural Relations,1999
2. Examining the nature and effects of psychological contract: case study of an Indian organization;Thunderbird International Business Review,2018
3. Reducing perceptions of overqualification and its impact on job satisfaction: the dual roles of interpersonal relationships at work;Human Resource Management Journal,2016
4. Anderson, S. and Winefield, A.H. (2011), “The impact of underemployment on psychological health, physical health, and work attitudes”, in Underemployment, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 165-185, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9413-4_9.
5. Do employees behave differently in public- vs private-sector organizations?: a state-of-the-art review;Public Management Review,2011