Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to illuminate for social studies teachers and teacher educators the ways in which students' disciplinary writing is scaffolded within the context of the inquiry design model; trends in such scaffolding are called “the learner's pathway,” since it leads students to more abstract levels of historical argumentation. The author argues that engaging historical writing genres is a necessary component of historical thinking and that understanding the ways that teachers support students' historical writing capacities can help them to make more intentional choices when building inquiries.Design/methodology/approachTo study genre-related scaffolding across inquiries, this study draws on systemic functional linguistics (SFL)-based genre theory as an analytical structure and seventy-four history-focused secondary social studies inquiries to determine any patterns in the ways that teachers scaffold students' writing genres through an inquiry.FindingsFindings suggest that there is a learner's pathway that teachers use to develop students' argumentative writing capacities; however, there is also evidence to suggest that notetaking and source synthesis are not valued instructional products, limiting the potential impact of historical thinking work within the inquiry process.Practical implicationsThe existence of this learner's pathway has implications for the ways that teachers and preservice teachers can be professionally developed to leverage this pathway. Rather than the often-used methods of support students' generic writing capacities, professional development should focus on the ways social studies teachers can guide students to more abstract reasoning through their writing. This study's findings also have implications for the ways that social studies teachers assess students' summative arguments. Assessment practices should focus on the genre-features of “argument” rather than just the stages of the argumentative essay.Originality/valueThis piece is original because genre-based research is missing from much of the social studies education research. This study's findings present an additional paradigm through which social studies teachers and teacher leaders can explore the purposes of historical writing tasks and assessment.
Reference46 articles.
1. Developing disciplinary literacy in a multilingual classroom;Linguistics and Education,2012
2. Beyond connectors: the construction of cause in history textbooks;Linguistics and Education,2005
3. Achugar, M. and Stainton, C. (2010), “Learning history and learning language: focusing on language in historical explanations to support English language learners”, in Stein, M.K. and Kucan, L. (Eds), Instructional Explanations in the Disciplines, Springer, pp. 145-169.
4. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals;Handbook I: Cognitive Domain,1956