Extrinsic and intrinsic determinants of quality of work life

Author:

Lewis David,Brazil Kevin,Krueger Paul,Lohfeld Lynne,Tjam Erin

Abstract

The objective of this research was to test whether extrinsic, intrinsic or “prior” traits best predict satisfaction with quality of work life (QWL) in health care. Extrinsic traits are salaries and other tangible benefits; intrinsic traits include skill levels, autonomy and challenge. Prior traits are those of the individuals involved, such as their gender or employment status. A survey of employees was conducted in seven different health‐care settings located in the south central region of Ontario, Canada. A total of 65 questions were gathered into scales measuring such factors as co‐worker support, supervisor support and teamwork and communication. These were factor‐analyzed into intrinsic and extrinsic variables, and regressed against a satisfaction scale, with socio‐demographic variables included. Based on the results, the following conclusions can be drawn: objectively identifiable traits of an organization – pay, benefits and supervisor style – play the major role in determining QWL satisfaction. Decision‐makers with an interest in improving QWL in a health‐care institution can focus on these traits and pay correspondingly less attention to enhancing staff autonomy or discretion.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. Alpander, C. (1990), “Relationship between commitment to hospital goals and job satisfaction: a case study of a nursing department”, Health Care Management Review, Vol. 15, pp. 51‐62.

2. Beall, C., Baumhover, L.A., Gillum, J. and Wells, A. (1994), “Job satisfaction of public health nurses: is there a predictable decline?”, Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 243‐60.

3. Blegen, M. (1993), “Nurses’ job satisfaction: a meta‐analysis of related variables”, Nurse Research, Vol. 42, pp. 36‐41.

4. Clegg, S.R. and Dunkerley, D. (1980), Organization, Class and Control, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

5. Clegg, S.R. and Hardy, C. (1996), “Organizations, organization and organizing”, in Clegg, S.R., Hardy, C. and Nord, W.R. (Eds), Handbook of Organization Studies, Sage, London.

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3