Knowledge management and innovation performance

Author:

Lundvall Bengt‐Åke,Nielsen Peter

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to show why the establishment of “learning organisations” must be a central element of knowledge management – especially in firms operating on markets where product innovation is an important parameter of competition.Design/methodology/approachThe argument straddles and combines insights related to management and organisation theory with an evolutionary economic analysis of the relationship between innovation, learning and knowledge. It is supported by an empirical analysis of survey data on Danish private sector firms. The survey was addressed to all firms in the private urban sector with 25 or more employees, supplemented with a stratified proportional sample of firms with 20‐25 employees.FindingsThe analysis shows that firms that introduce several organisational practices, assumed to characterise the learning organisation, are more innovative than the average firm.Research limitations/implicationsThe empirical findings are limited to the private sector and do not cover public sector organisations.Practical implicationsThe learning organisation characteristics have a positive impact on dynamic performance and there are obviously lessons to be learned from the successful firms operating in turbulent environments that introduce specific organisational characteristics such as job rotation, inter‐divisional teams, delegation of responsibility and reducing the number of levels in the organisational hierarchy.Originality/valueThe paper puts “knowledge management” into the wider concept of “learning economy” and shows how a key element of knowledge management is to enhance the learning capacity of the firm.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management

Reference46 articles.

1. Ackoff, R.L. (1989), “From data to wisdom”, Journal of Applied System Analysis, Vol. 16, pp. 3‐9.

2. Antonelli, C. (1999), The Microdynamics of Technological Change, Routledge, London.

3. Arrow, K.J. (1962), “The economic implications of learning by doing”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 155‐73.

4. Arrow, K.J. (1971), “Political and economic evaluation of social effects and externalities”, in Intrilligator, M. (Ed.), Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, North Holland, Amsterdam.

5. Arrow, K.J. (1994), “Methodological individualism and social knowledge”, American Economic Review, Vol. 89 No. 2, pp. 1‐9.

Cited by 135 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3