Competencies for interdisciplinarity in higher education
Abstract
PurposeThe overall purpose of this paper is to clarify the current state of the debate with regard to competencies for interdisciplinarity (ID) for sustainable development (SD) in higher education, to provide further analysis, and to make suggestions for next steps on this basis.Design/methodology/approachThe paper employs a critical literature review to identify key themes and gaps in the debate and considers how competencies for ID might be further supported.FindingsThe literature review demonstrates developments towards action competencies in ID for sustainability but with an over‐reliance on students guiding their own practice and reflection. Findings highlight potential elements of a more widely informed knowledge literacy, including philosophical, sociological and cultural aspects, that is needed to support the development of these competencies.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper is limited to discussion of foundational aspects and does not cover possible pedagogical strategies, nor does it cover ways of assessing the attainment of competencies. The literature review is also limited by reasons of space.Practical implicationsThere is a need for a concerted research effort in order to develop coherent sets of competencies to equip students for ID for SD and other‐related fields.Social implicationsThese competencies are at the heart of the new forms of inter‐agency and inter‐professional working that is increasingly recognised as essential to deliver care and sustainability in a joined‐up world.Originality/valueThe originality is high as very little in the sustainability literature to date specifically analyses competencies and supporting knowledge for ID in an accessible manner.
Subject
Education,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference46 articles.
1. Aboelela, S.W., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S.A., Haas, J. and Gebbie, K.M. (2007), “Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature”, Health Services Research, Vol. 42 No. 1 Pt 1, pp. 329‐46. 2. Barrett, A. and Tikly, L. (2010), “Conceptualising education quality: towards an EdQual framework presentation”, available at: www.edqual.org/edqual/publications/edqualpresentationgsoefeb10.pdf (accessed 20 March 2010). 3. Barth, M., Godemann, J., Rieckmann, M. and Stoltenberg, U. (2007), “Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 416‐30. 4. Bhaskar, R. (2010), “Contexts of interdisciplinarity”, in Bhaskar, R., Frank, C., Hoyer, K.C., Naess, P. and Parker, J. (Eds), Interdisciplinarity and Climate Change, Routledge, London. 5. Bhaskar, R. and Danermark, B. (2006), “Metatheory, interdisciplinarity and disability research: a critical realist perspective”, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 278‐97.
Cited by
65 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|