A review and content analysis of U.S. Department of Corrections end-of-life decision making policies

Author:

Helmly Victoria,Garica Marisol,Williams Brie,Howell Benjamin A.

Abstract

Purpose With a rapidly growing population of older adults with chronic illness in US prisons, the number of people who die while incarcerated is increasing. Support for patients’ medical decision-making is a cornerstone of quality care for people at the end of life (EOL). This study aims to identify, describe, and analyze existing policies regarding EOL decision-making in U.S. Departments of Corrections. Design/methodology/approach This study performed an iterative content analysis on all available EOL decision-making policies in US state departments of corrections and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Findings This study collected and reviewed available policies from 37 of 51 prison systems (73%). Some areas of commonality included the importance of establishing health-care proxies and how to transfer EOL decision documents, although policies differed in terms of which patients can complete advance care planning documents, and who can serve as their surrogate decision-makers. Practical implications Many prison systems have an opportunity to enhance their patient medical decision-making policies to bring them in line with community standard quality of care. In addition, this study was unable to locate policies regarding patient decision-making at the EOL in one quarter of US prison systems, suggesting there may be quality-of-care challenges around formalized approaches to documenting patient medical wishes in some of those prison systems. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first content analysis of EOL decision-making policies in US prison systems.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Professions (miscellaneous)

Reference22 articles.

1. Aging prisoners’ concerns toward dying in prison;Omega: Journal of Death and Dying,2005

2. American Geriatrics Society (2017), “Advance care planning for older adults”, available at: www.americangeriatrics.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/AGS%20Statement%20on%20Advance%20Care%20Planning_FINAL%20%28August%202017%29.pdf

3. American Medical Association Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 5.1 (2021), “Advance care planning”, available at: www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/advance-care-planning

4. Effectiveness of palliative care interventions offering social support to people with life-limiting illness: a systematic review;European Journal of Cancer Care,2018

5. A ‘good death’ for all? Examining issues for palliative care in correctional settings;Mortality,2016

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3