Examining the perceived transparency of DTC genetic testing company communication and its impact on consumer trust, attitude and behavioral intentions

Author:

Abitbol AlanORCID,Lee Nicole M.,VanDyke Matthew S.

Abstract

PurposeThis study examines perceived transparency of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing communication and measures its impact on consumers' trust, attitudes, and the intention to recommend the test to others.Design/methodology/approachAn online survey of US–based adults (over 18 years of age) (N = 271) was administered by the online panel company Qualtrics Panels. The sample consisted of participants who have taken a DTC genetic test previously because only existing consumers could provide insight into companies' transparency about the entire genetic testing process (including the communication before, during, and after) as they experienced it. Participants were asked questions that measured intention to recommend DTC genetic tests to others, trust, attitude toward the DTC testing, and perceptions of transparency of the DTC companies' communication.FindingsResults indicated that consumers who perceive DTC genetic testing companies to be transparent in their communication tend to trust the genetic testing process more, have more positive attitudes toward DTC genetic tests, and are more likely to recommend the tests to others.Research limitations/implicationsThis study integrates corporate communication and science communication through the theoretical framework of transparency. It empirically demonstrates that message transparency is key to increasing the publics' trust, attitude and behavioral intentions toward companies that involve sensitive health information or online privacy.Originality/valueThis paper answers previous calls to explore the organizational approach of science communication in the context of the under-examined companies in the science and health sectors, specifically the DTC genetic testing industry.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Communication

Reference61 articles.

1. Akin, H. and Scheufele, D.A. (2017), “Overview of the science of science communication”, in Jamieson, K.H., Kahan, D.M. and Scheufele, D. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook on the Science of Science Communication, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 25-33.

2. Reacting to genetic risk: an experimental survey of life between health and disease;Journal of Health and Social Behavior,2014

3. Baig, E.C. (2019), “Ancestry launches DNA health service that will compete with 23andMe”, available at: https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2019/10/15/ancestry-launches-dna-health-tests-assess-your-genetic-risks/3977076002/.

4. How mass media simulate political transparency;Cultural Values,1999

5. Science communication: a contemporary definition;Public Understanding of Science,2003

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Data-Driven Insights;Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services;2024-05-20

2. The Role of Human Voice in Direct-To-Consumer Health Communication;Health Communication;2024-04-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3